November 20, 2004

Unbelievable

Last night we had dinner at the Quarterdeck in Maynard with Mark and Ginger. We had four distinct choices: Indian, Thai, and Korean, but we chose fish. And it was delicious. Especially the appetizers: seared Sashimi cut wafer thin with a narrow crust of peppercorns and mustard, Coconut Crusted Scallops with chili sauce and the New England staple, fried clam bellies.

Sometime during the evening someone says the word "interesting."

I launch into one of my mini tirades.

Me: "What is the single most overused, boring and meaningless word?"

Ginger: "Interesting?"

Me: "No, worse.”

Diane, “Fascinating?”

Me: “Worse.”

For me the word is “unbelievable,” and I’m sure someone will guess it. I pause again.

Mark: "I love you?"

I shall not even try to comment on Mark's guess.

But, for overused and thus meaningless, "awesome" gets my vote.

Posted by Hyperbole.

Wow.

Such deep thought. :-)

Posted by Coffee Boy.

I kinda like awesome ; ) .

After I entered “unbelievable” into the lexicon of works I hate, I was forced to defend my position. “But what about the Red Sox? That was unbelievable.”

“No it wasn’t. It was just a FU*KING sporting event (I get polarized so easily). Jesus Christ walking down Central St MIGHT be unbelievable.”

Posted by michael.

How dare you. The red sox were/are unbelievable. And awesome. And interesting and fascinating too. So there. When you run out of adjectives the above are just fine. As for me it is the F word that is over used, so much so that it doesn't pack a punch anymore. So that is the answer. When it no longer packs a punch or conjures up what it should, it needs to be retired. For those for whom it still packs a punch, the Sox were Fu*king unbelievable.

Posted by indignant.

Right on!

Posted by rakkity.

The next to fall might be one of my favorites, as it does not presuppose the nature of an emotion/reaction, just that a reaction is expected -- "remarkable". I find it can be used with deliberation and is appropriate to a good many situations. But its flexibility may well be its downfall......

Posted by artful dodger.

Posted by Michael at November 20, 2004 11:03 AM
Comments

I shall not even try to comment on Mark's guess.

But, for overused and thus meaningless, "awesome" gets my vote.

Posted by: Hyperboleat November 21, 2004 09:04 AM

Wow.

Such deep thought. :-)

Posted by: Coffee Boyat November 21, 2004 09:06 AM

I kinda like awesome ; ) .

After I entered “unbelievable” into the lexicon of works I hate, I was forced to defend my position. “But what about the Red Sox? That was unbelievable.”

“No it wasn’t. It was just a FU*KING sporting event (I get polarized so easily). Jesus Christ walking down Central St MIGHT be unbelievable.”

Posted by: michaelat November 21, 2004 09:37 AM

How dare you. The red sox were/are unbelievable. And awesome. And interesting and fascinating too. So there. When you run out of adjectives the above are just fine. As for me it is the F word that is over used, so much so that it doesn't pack a punch anymore. So that is the answer. When it no longer packs a punch or conjures up what it should, it needs to be retired. For those for whom it still packs a punch, the Sox were Fu*king unbelievable.

Posted by: indignantat November 21, 2004 04:44 PM

Right on!

Posted by: rakkityat November 22, 2004 01:53 PM

The next to fall might be one of my favorites, as it does not presuppose the nature of an emotion/reaction, just that a reaction is expected -- "remarkable". I find it can be used with deliberation and is appropriate to a good many situations. But its flexibility may well be its downfall......

Posted by: artful dodgerat November 22, 2004 07:51 PM